9/11 Unanswered Questions: Mysterious September 11, 2001 Breakfast Meeting on Capitol Hill
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, September 11, 2017
We bring to the attention of our readers Michel Chossudovskys article published in 2002 pertaining to the role of Sen Bob Graham and Rep Porter Goss, chairmen of the Joint inquiry on 9/11 of the Senate and House of Representatives. A mysterious September 11 breakfast meeting hosted by Sen Bob Graham and Rep Porter Goss was held with the head of Pakistani intelligence on the morning of 9/11.
In recent developments, Porter Goss and Bob Graham have taken the initiative to demand the release of the 28 pages of their report which focussed on the role of Saudi Arabia in supporting the alleged 911 terrorists, These 28 pages are now in the public domain and are the object of debate.
While the Joint inquiry (under the helm of Bob Graham and Porter Goss) has collected mountains of intelligence material, through careful omission, the numerous press and intelligence reports in the public domain (mainstream media, alternative media, etc), which confirm that key members of the Bush Administration were involved in acts of political camouflage, have been carefully removed from the Joint inquirys hearings.
In retrospect, the mission of Porter Goss and Bob Graham to Pakistan in late August 2001 (which was documented in my earlier writings) was part of the preparation of the propaganda campaign, with a view to sustaining the official narrative, i.e Al Qaeda was behind the conspiracy to bring down the WTC towers, Muslims did it, etc., which essentially sustains the official 9/11 narrative.
Sixteen years later, the propaganda campaign seeks to infiltrate the 9/11 Truth movement by bringing in the notorious 28 pages. What is now occurring is that Al Qaeda did it, but they were supported by Saudi Arabia (according to the 28 pages), all of which is meant to dispel the fact amply documented that Al Qaeda did not have the ability to bring down the towers and that Al Qaeda has been supported from the outset by the CIA. The towers were brought down through controlled demolition
Michel Chossudovsky, September 7, 2016, September 10, 2017
* * *
Mysterious September 11 2001 Breakfast Meeting on Capitol Hill
by Michel Chossudovsky
The following text published by Global Research in 2002, provides details on the breakfast meeting hosted by Sen Bob Graham and Rep. Porter Goss on the morning of September 11.
In late August 2001, barely a couple of weeks before 9/11, Senator Bob Graham, Representative Porter Goss and Senator Jon Kyl were in Islamabad for consultations. Meetings were held with President Musharraf and with Pakistans military and intelligence brass including the head of Pakistans Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) General Mahmoud Ahmad. An AFP report confirms that the US Congressional delegation also met the Afghan ambassador to Pakistan, Abdul Salam Zaeef. At this meeting, which was barely mentioned by the US media, Zaeef assured the US delegation [on behalf of the Afghan government] that the Taliban would never allow bin Laden to use Afghanistan to launch attacks on the US or any other country. 1
Note the sequencing of these meetings. Bob Graham and Porter Goss were in Islamabad in late August 2001. The meetings with President Musharraf and the Afghan Ambassador were on the 27th of August, the mission was still in Islamabad on the 30th of August, General Mahmoud Ahmad arrived in Washington on an official visit of consultations barely a few days later (September 4th). During his visit to Washington, General Mahmoud met his counterpart CIA director George Tenet and high ranking officials of the Bush administration.2
9/11 Follow-up Meeting on Capitol Hill
On the morning of September 11, the three lawmakers Bob Graham, Porter Goss and Jon Kyl (who were part of the Congressional delegation to Pakistan) were having breakfast on Capitol Hill with General Ahmad, the alleged money-man behind the 9-11 hijackers. Also present at this meeting were Pakistans ambassador to the U.S. Maleeha Lodhi and several members of the Senate and House Intelligence committees were also present. This meeting was described by one press report as a follow-up meeting to that held in Pakistan in late August. On 8/30, Senate Intelligence Committee chair Sen. Bob Graham (D-FL) was on a mission to learn more about terrorism. ( ) On 9/11, Graham was back in DC in a follow-up meeting with Pakistan intelligence agency chief Mahmud Ahmed and House Intelligence Committee chair Porter Goss (R-FL) 3 (The Hotline, 1 October 2002):
When the news [of the attacks on the World Trade Center] came, the two Florida lawmakers who lead the House and Senate intelligence committees were having breakfast with the head of the Pakistani intelligence service. Rep. Porter Goss, R-Sanibel, Sen. Bob Graham and other members of the House Intelligence Committee were talking about terrorism issues with the Pakistani official when a member of Goss staff handed a note to Goss, who handed it to Graham. We were talking about terrorism, specifically terrorism generated from Afghanistan, Graham said.
Mahmood Ahmed, director general of Pakistans intelligence service, was very empathetic, sympathetic to the people of the United States, Graham said.
Goss could not be reached Tuesday [September 11]. He was whisked away with much of the House leadership to an undisclosed secure location. Graham, meanwhile, participated in late-afternoon briefings with top officials from the CIA and FBI. 4
While trivializing the importance of the 9/11 breakfast meeting, The Miami Herald (16 September 2001) confirms that General Ahmad also met Secretary of State Colin Powell in the wake of the 9/11 attacks: Graham said the Pakistani intelligence official with whom he met, a top general in the government, was forced to stay all week in Washington because of the shutdown of air traffic He was marooned here, and I think that gave Secretary of State Powell and others in the administration a chance to really talk with him. Graham said.5
Again the political significance of the personal relationship between General
Mahmoud (the alleged money man behind 9/11) and Secretary of State
Colin Powell is casually dismissed. According to The Miami Herald, the high
level meeting between the two men was not planned in advance. It took place
on the spur of the moment because of the shut down of air traffic, which prevented
General Mahmoud from flying back home to Islamabad on a commercial flight, when
in all probability the General and his delegation were traveling on a chartered
government plane. With the exception of the Florida press (and Salon.com, 14
September), not a word was mentioned in the US medias September coverage
of 9-11 concerning this mysterious breakfast reunion.
A Cloak but No Dagger
Eight months later on the 18th of May, two days after the BUSH KNEW headline hit the tabloids, the Washington Post published an article on Porter Goss, entitled: A Cloak But No Dagger; An Ex-Spy Says He Seeks Solutions, Not Scapegoats for 9/11. Focusing on his career as a CIA agent, the article largely served to underscore the integrity and commitment of Porter Goss to waging a war on terrorism. Yet in an isolated paragraph, the article acknowledges the mysterious 9/11 breakfast meeting with ISI Chief Mahmoud Ahmad, while also confirming that Ahmad :ran a spy agency notoriously close to Osama bin Laden and the Taliban:
Now the main question facing Goss, as he helps steer a joint House-Senate investigation into the Sept. 11 attacks, is why nobody in the far-flung intelligence bureaucracy 13 agencies spending billions of dollars paid attention to the enemy among us. Until it was too late.
Goss says he is looking for solutions, not scapegoats. A lot of nonsense, he calls this weeks uproar about a CIA briefing that alerted President Bush, five weeks before Sept. 11, that Osama bin Ladens associates might be planning airline hijackings.
None of this is news, but its all part of the finger-pointing, Goss declared yesterday in a rare display of pique. Its foolishness. [This statement comes from the man who was having breakfast with the alleged money-man behind 9-11 on the morning of September 11]
( ) Goss has repeatedly refused to blame an intelligence failure for the terror attacks. As a 10-year veteran of the CIAs clandestine operations wing, Goss prefers to praise the agencys fine work.
On the morning of Sept. 11, Goss and Graham were having breakfast with a Pakistani general named Mahmud Ahmed the soon-to-be-sacked head of Pakistans intelligence service. Ahmed ran a spy agency notoriously close to Osama bin Laden and the Taliban. 6 (Washington Post, 18 May 2002)
Putting Two and Two together
While the Washington Post scores in on the notoriously close links between General Ahmad and Osama bin Laden, it fails to dwell on the more important question: what were Rep. Porter Goss and Senator Bob Graham and other members of the Senate and House intelligence committees doing together with the alleged 9/11 money-man at breakfast on the morning of 9/11. In other words, the Washington Post report does not go one inch further in begging the real question: Was this mysterious breakfast venue a political lapse, an intelligence failure or something far more serious? How come the very same individuals (Goss and Graham) who had developed a personal rapport with General Ahmad, had been entrusted under the joint committee inquiry to reveal the truth on 9-11.(see p. )
The media trivialises the breakfast meeting, it presents it as a simple fait divers and fails to put two and two together. Neither does it acknowledge the fact, amply documented, that the money-man behind the hijackers had been entrusted by the Pakistani government to discuss the precise terms of Pakistans collaboration in the war on terrorism in meetings held behind closed doors at the State department on the 12th and 13th of September. 11 7(See Michel Chossudovsky, op cit)
When the foreknowledge issue hit the street on May 16th, Chairman Porter Goss said an existing congressional inquiry has so far found no smoking gun that would warrant another inquiry. 8 This statement points to an obvious cover-up. The smoking gun was right there sitting in the plush surroundings of the Congressional breakfast venue on Capitol on the morning of September 11.
1 Agence France Presse (AFP), 28 August 2001.
2. Michel Chossudovsky, Political Deception, The Missing Link behind 9/11, Global Outlook, No. 2, 2002, See also . http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html ; See also Michel Chossudovsky, Cover-up or Complicity of the Bush Administration? The Role of Pakistans Military Intelligence (ISI) in the September 11 Attacks, November 2001, http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO111A.html
3. The Hotline, 1 October 2002.
4 Stuart News Company Press Journal, Vero Beach, FL, 12 September 2001.
5 Miami Herald, 16 September 2001.
6. Washington Post, 18 May 2002.
7. Michel Chossudovsky, op. cit.
8. White House Bulletin, 17 May 2002.